Ah, that would explain it! Considering that the GitHub repo is referenced on the project page as an alternative way to get the source, we might want to keep it up to date. Didn't Vic have a script back in the day to take care of this?
Daniel On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Assaf Arkin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Daniel Spiewak <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Actually, the buildr/buildr repository at GitHub isn't syncing *at all* > > with > > the SVN anymore. It's missing quite a few of the latest commits. > > > AFAIK it never synched, those were all manual pushes. > > > > > > > Daniel > > > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Daniel Spiewak <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > I just noticed that the 1.3.4 release hasn't been tagged yet in Git. > Did > > > something just not sync yet? > > > > > > Daniel > > > > > >
