http://www.engineyard.com/blog/2010/rake-and-ant-together-a-pick-it-n-stick-it-approach/
Charles Nutter pointed this out to me today. For those of you who don't have time to read the *entire* article, this is basically bi-directional integration between Ant and Rake. So, one direction is similar to Antwrap, except with a much nicer syntax. This might be something we could use to replace Antwrap, which I never really cared for. The only hang-up there is we still need to support MRI, and I doubt this works on top of RJB. The other direction allows Ant to use Rake tasks as if they were Ant targets. I think this is huge for us. Since Buildr is based on Rake, this would mean that Ant builds could depend directly on Buildr tasks, making it possible to gradually migrate from an existing Ant build system to one based on Buildr. How 'bout them apples? Daniel
