Fine by me and thanks for picking that up. Alex
On Monday, May 31, 2010, Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt < pepijn.vaneeckho...@luciad.com> wrote: > I've been going through the specs and up until now all failures are related to utime not behaving as expected on windows. I'm changing the specs so that they don't rely on utime but use sleeps instead. This makes the specs much more reliable (se linux doesn't allow mtime to be set in the past either IIRC), at the cost of slightly slower execution due to the sleeps. Is this acceptable? > > Pepijn >
