Yes. Our trunk now works with jruby 1.5, they had a regression that blocked us.
They are releasing JRuby 1.5.1 this week and I think we should release at that time. On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 17:26, Tal Rotbart <redbe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi guys, > > Following the different threads regarding Buildr and JRuby 1.5 is > confusing -- am I correct in understanding that it is only with Buildr > 1.4 that the support for JRuby 1.5 will be available? > > Cheers, > Tal > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 8:41 AM, Antoine Toulme <anto...@lunar-ocean.com> > wrote: > > How about we add a spec for it over ruby core ? Just so that all ruby > impls > > align on that. > > I'm filing http://rubyspec.org/projects/rubyspec/issues/show?id=226 for > > this. Let's see how it goes. > > > > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 15:25, Charles Oliver Nutter < > head...@headius.com>wrote: > > > >> I doubt it was intentional...I'm sure we're just getting the full raw > >> ms time and using that. It may represent a valid behavioral difference > >> (i.e. maybe the specified behavior should be only checking seconds) > >> but that seems unlikely... > >> > >> Anyway, I'll leave it in your hands if you guys want to file a bug or > not. > >> > >> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Antoine Toulme < > anto...@lunar-ocean.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Alex pointed me to the fact that a.mtime == b.mtime compares values to > a > >> > unit smaller than a second, while it apparently stops at the second so > >> far > >> > with MRI. > >> > So we stopped doing mtime equality because it was a bad idea, but you > >> might > >> > want to look into this, if that change was not intended. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 15:14, Charles Oliver Nutter < > >> head...@headius.com> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Antoine Toulme < > >> anto...@lunar-ocean.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 15:02, Charles Oliver Nutter > >> >> > <head...@headius.com> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I have not looked at the issues...they don't happen with RJB? > >> >> > > >> >> > No idea, because win7 and RJB kinda suck. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> It could > >> >> >> be a problem with the way we implement mtime on Windows. Any > update > >> on > >> >> >> this in the past few days? (I was out of town). > >> >> > > >> >> > We changed the way we test mtime. Instead of doing ==, we now use < > >> and > >> >> > > to > >> >> > avoid races. > >> >> > We still have a few failing specs re permissions. No headway on > those. > >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> We're looking to push JRuby 1.5.1 very soon, so if there's > something > >> >> >> to fix we need to get it in. > >> >> > > >> >> > So far nothing to report. > >> >> > >> >> If you can narrow it down to something specific broken in JRuby, > we'll > >> >> gladly fix it. > >> >> > >> >> - Charlie > >> > > >> > > >> > > >
