+1 -- Dominic Graefen
On Wednesday, June 22, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Chris Samuel wrote: > +1 > > On Jun 21, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Alex Boisvert <alex.boisv...@gmail.com > (mailto:alex.boisv...@gmail.com)> wrote: > > > As discussed earlier, JtestR integration has become a maintenance burden > > that I can no longer sustain in my limited open-source time. In case you > > haven't followed, the main issue is that JtestR is only compatible with a > > restricted set of dependencies (notably rspec 1.3.0 and only up to JRuby > > 1.5.4) which conflicts with buildr's own set of dependencies. There is no > > plan <http://markmail.org/message/ifjbbh6ppyufvxmi> to upgrade JtestR to > > rspec 2.0 and combined with the very few users actually relying on JtestR > > means the feature doesn't support its own weight. > > > > VOTE > > [ ] +1 Agree to remove JtestR support > > [ ] +/- 0 No opinion > > [ ] -1 Disagree to remove JTestR support (and propose solution to JtestR > > maintenance) > > > > If anybody wants to step up and maintain JtestR integration, I would advise > > converting it into a plugin separate from Buildr's core. I believe a > > separate release cycle would probably serve users better in any case. > > > > thanks, > > alex
