1.5.1 is slipping into 2017. No worries, we’ll get it down.
> On Dec 4, 2016, at 10:04 PM, Antoine Toulme <anto...@toulme.name> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 23, 2016, at 2:22 PM, Peter Donald <pe...@realityforge.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Antoine Toulme <anto...@toulme.name> wrote: >> >>> the board meeting went over well. >>> >> >> great. >> >> >>> We’re still due for a big discussion on how to sustain and attract more >>> people to the project. I started something, and well now we’re a month >>> later. >>> >> >> Yep. Sorry - I am not going to be much help until after the xmas season :( >> Small child and large family :) > No worries. >> >> 1.5.1 is still very much time bound to Christmas time. Interestingly, no >>> bugs on 1.5.0 have surfaced but one, so far. >>> >> >> Nothing popped up here in all our testing. So I think it must be fairly >> solid. > Cool. >> >> >>> I’m going to try to knock a few things off the bug list. >>> >> >> Great. The requests that I hear are often about how to make it easier to >> integrate into the wider ecosystem. In no particular order the requests are; >> >> * Easier to launch/install (which your docker work may handle) > OK. Still much to do there. >> * Integrate `buildr/custom_pom` into core and just make it the default pom >> generated. > BUILDR-729 filed. >> * Add a mechanism to more easily declare "provided" dependencies. It has >> been suggested that something like "compile.provides << :mydep" may work >> but not sure how this request interacts with `buildr/custom_pom`. Maybe >> `custom_pom` could be based of this. > Added as a comment of BUILDR-729. >> * Add a way to do a "full" release to maven central. I am not sure exactly >> what this means but I get the impression that some tools allow you to >> upload to the maven central staging repository, "close" the repository and >> "release" the repository. I currently do steps 2 and 3 manually and don't >> find it too onerous but others have suggested that they would like it >> "fixed”. > Wow, not sure about this. I’ve been doing some releases to Maven Central with > Buildr and it did look like you need to do those steps manually. > I filed BUILDR-730 for this. >> >> Anyhoo - just in case you need some new ideas ;) >> >> >>> >>> I played with making a Docker image using a minified JDK9 image to run >>> Buildr. RJB doesn’t work well with it right now. >>> https://github.com/atoulme/docker-buildr/blob/master/Dockerfile < >>> https://github.com/atoulme/docker-buildr/blob/master/Dockerfile> >>> >> >> >> Interesting. We use an alpine+jdk7 image locally. I may experiment with it >> over the weekend ;) >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> >> Peter Donald
