+1 regards, gerhard
2012/3/19 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > yup 0.4 is fine as well. > > > I'd even say 0.8 or 0.9 is better ;) > > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> > > To: dev@bval.apache.org; Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > > Cc: > > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 8:12 PM > > Subject: Re: Are we ready for a 1.0 release candidate? > > > >G erhard pointed out to me that there may be other items we want to > > look at (e.g. Apache* classnames) in addition to the logging > > discussion before we call our implementation "baked enough for 1.0". > > I tend to agree with him and will proceed with 0.4 to be followed with > > a 1.0 in the near future, unless anyone disagrees. > > > > Matt > > > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > wrote: > >> Folks this logging discussion sucks ^^ > >> > >> Ok, not the _discussion_ sucks, the topic does ;) > >> > >> We need this stuff over and over again, and I really do think this > loudly > > cries out for a commons-logging-2 or so. > >> > >> I already wrote this to the commons list, because we have this > discussion > > over and over again on various projects. > >> > >> LieGrue, > >> strub > >> > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> From: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> > >>> To: dev@bval.apache.org > >>> Cc: > >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 6:18 PM > >>> Subject: Re: Are we ready for a 1.0 release candidate? > >>> > >>> hi matt, > >>> > >>> +1! for a release, but i'm not sure if we should call it v1.0 > > already (if i > >>> remember correctly, we still don't have an agreement e.g. about the > > logging > >>> framework). > >>> > >>> regards, > >>> gerhard > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> 2012/3/13 Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com> > >>> > >>>> Subject says it all. Some of our other Apache TLPs would like to > > see > >>>> us make a release. It's been a long time since > > 0.3-incubating, and > >>>> 1.0 would be a great way to inaugurate the project after having > > moved > >>>> to TLP. > >>>> > >>>> Matt > >>>> > >>> > > >
