Thanks so much for your work, Matt! I gonna update TomEE8 to the latest bval-2 snapshot!
LieGrue, strub > Am 19.04.2018 um 16:55 schrieb Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>: > > Thanks Romain--that seems to have done it! We are green. :) > > Matt > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:17 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Pushed an (hopefully) fix, no issue to revert if it didn't help - I didnt >> patch the tck so there is still a small "?" to have some regression. >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ >> rmannibucau> | >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- >> ee-8-high-performance> >> >> 2018-04-19 8:42 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Will try to check today >>> >>> Le 19 avr. 2018 00:26, "Matt Benson" <mben...@apache.org> a écrit : >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> As of a few minutes ago our bv2 branch passes the 2.0 branch of the >> TCK >>>> with the PR from BVTCK-205 built in... with the exception of a single >>>> test, org.hibernate.beanvalidation.tck.tests.bootstrap.BootstrapCo >>>> nfigurationTest. >>>> What seems to be happening here is that our CDI extension is more eager >>>> than the TCK wants it to be: if no one has injected the default >>>> ValidatorFactory or its Validator, the test seems to rely on the >>>> extension's not attempting to instantiate it. My CDI-fu is pretty weak >> if >>>> anybody else wants to have a look at this. >>>> >>>> Matt >>>> >>> >>
