Okay, we have several problems happening here; I'm going to cancel this vote and re-roll rc2. Thanks to all who voted.
Matt On Tue, Oct 23, 2018, 2:09 PM Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: > To be clear, I purposely removed the source archive (now archives) from > the Maven deployment, but apparently that also removed them from the > signing process. This will need to be fixed in the build. > > Matt > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2018, 2:07 PM Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Mark. I have generated the signatures manually and added to the >> dev distribution repo, revision 30249. >> >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2018, 1:52 PM Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> * sha512 ok* builds fine* passes TCK (after export LANG=en_EN, but this >>> is a known TCK bug)* RAT passes* signature fine >>> But I cannot find the asc signature nor can I find the source zip on >>> repository.apache.org. >>> LieGrue,strub >>> >>> On Saturday, 20 October 2018, 16:45:54 CEST, Roberto Cortez >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Thank you Matt! >>> >>> > On 18 Oct 2018, at 13:01, Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > I've created a 2.0.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts >>> up for >>> > a vote: >>> > >>> > Git source tag: >>> > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=bval.git;a=tag;h=e828a49ce4bcb8701ddc023f630ef3b18adad950 >>> > >>> > >>> > Maven staging repo: >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-1005 >>> > >>> > >>> > Source release: >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bval/source (r30138) >>> > >>> > Generated site: >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bval/2.0.0-RC1/site/index.html >>> > >>> > >>> > PGP release keys: >>> > http://www.apache.org/dist/bval/KEYS >>> > >>> > >>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>> > >>> > [ ] +1 approve >>> > [ ] +0 no opinion >>> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>> >> >>
