Hi,

IMO we can just release 3.0.0; we pass the TCK, so it should be stable.


Am Fr., 21. Apr. 2023 um 08:40 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
[email protected]>:

> Hi,
>
> What the plan to be final? Idea would be that if alpha is not justified by
> coming work let's do a final.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le ven. 21 avr. 2023 à 08:29, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
>
> > hi folks!
> >
> > BVAL-3.0 looks already really decent - thanks for all that hard work!
> > What do you think about an alpha-1 release?
> >
> > I've yesterday published a snapshot to our official ASF snapshots repo to
> > be able to work on OpenJPA-4.0.
> > But before we do any release of a EE9/10 project we'd need some other
> > stable releases first. BVAL is rather low in the dependency graph, so I'd
> > go for it soonish.
> >
> > wdyt?
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
>

Reply via email to