+1

Downloaded it, checked the signatures, built it, run the test suite.

Thanks,
Jesús






On 6/7/16, 7:42 PM, "Alan Gates" <[email protected]> wrote:

>+1.  Checked the signatures, did a build, and ran rat.  The rat check fails 
>because the git.properties file doesn’t have an Apache License.  This isn’t 
>worth re-rolling for, but it would be nice to fix in the future (or add 
>git.properties to rat’s excludes) so the rat check passes.
>
>Alan.
>
>> On Jun 6, 2016, at 14:05, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.8.0, release candidate 0.
>> 
>> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release. It includes
>> two new adapters (Druid and Elasticsearch), several important SQL
>> enhancements, and a couple of dozen other features and bug-fixes.
>> You can read the release notes here:
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/branch-1.8/site/_docs/history.md
>> 
>> The commit to be voted upon:
>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/calcite/commit/ab998a0075e31ccdd63ed219c2126a572198e46f
>> 
>> Its hash is ab998a0075e31ccdd63ed219c2126a572198e46f.
>> 
>> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.8.0-rc0
>> 
>> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
>> src.tar.gz.md5 27252bba31a669fc7fa8c12ea46aaf6c
>> src.tar.gz.sha1 db5c070b0b3504b1c1313102f5113aa57ea38afa
>> src.zip.md5 bef6b73415960eb66e54804564c08704
>> src.zip.sha1 288ddc399e607fb9ad269c936c6125efd27a59f4
>> 
>> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1021
>> 
>> Release artifacts are signed with my public key, whose fingerprint is
>> DD31 4F5E 1773 7D76 A554  DCE8 DDB6 E981 2AD3 FAE3
>> 
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.8.0.
>> 
>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of
>> at least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> 
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.8.0
>> [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> 
>> 
>> Here is my vote:
>> 
>> +1 (binding)
>> 
>> Julian
>> 
>
>

Reply via email to