Ok, good. I’ve just started a vote for RC2.

> On Dec 18, 2018, at 6:40 AM, Zoltan Haindrich <k...@rxd.hu> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Sorry for holding it back...I was busy doing other things...
> I've went thru it; and right now I don't see any new issues; I've only 
> noticed a bug going away :)
> 
> cheers,
> Zoltan
> 
> On 12/18/18 3:21 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>> Zoltan,
>> Can you give us a status update please?
>> The release train is waiting for you.
>> Julian
>>> On Dec 16, 2018, at 12:20 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> An update on release 1.18.
>>> 
>>> We have had two release candidates RC0 and RC1, and both votes have
>>> been cancelled due to faults found by Hive's test suite.
>>> 
>>> I will roll RC2 when I hear from Zoltan that the Hive suite has passed
>>> against the latest commit. See
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2731.
>>> 
>>> Jacques just pushed a fix to master. I backed it out because (a) our
>>> policy is to release from master branch, which means that we have to
>>> lock master during releases, and (b) his commit generated warnings. It
>>> will go into 1.19. See
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2736.
>>> 
>>> I let Jesus commit a minor addendum to
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2673 on Friday.
>>> 
>>> Julian
>>> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 6:04 PM Francis Chuang <francischu...@apache.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Julian,
>>>> 
>>>> Avatica 1.13.0 has been tagged and pushed. I also uploaded the release
>>>> artifacts and I am just waiting for the artifacts to propagate across
>>>> the mirrors before I make a formal announcement and push the website.
>>>> 
>>>> Francis
>>>> 
>>>> On 3/12/2018 10:08 am, Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>> Francis,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Much appreciated! The nexus push was successful, and I was able to use
>>>>> avatica-1.13 in builds. I'll make sure that we do not announce the
>>>>> Calcite release 1.18, or push the
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2716 fix to master,
>>>>> until avatica-1.13 is officially announced.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Julian
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 12:23 AM Francis Chuang <francischu...@apache.org> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks for taking this on, Julian!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The vote for Avatica 1.13.0 has closed and I plan to release the 1.13.0
>>>>>> soon (I need to wait for the docker hub repository in INFRA-17333 [1] to
>>>>>> be created, otherwise the docker hub build will fail once I push the tag
>>>>>> for rel/avatica-1.13.0.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've promoted the 1.13.0 repository in nexus, so this should not block
>>>>>> Calcite 1.18.0-rc0.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Francis
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17333
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 1/12/2018 11:11 pm, Michael Mior wrote:
>>>>>>> Thanks Julian! Unfortunately with family visiting this weekend, my
>>>>>>> bandwidth is currently fairly low but I'll try to churn through some PRs
>>>>>>> early this coming week.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018, 23:00 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It looks as if Avatica will be released soon, and as that was our main
>>>>>>>> dependency for Calcite 1.18, we can move ahead with the release.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I volunteer to be release manager for Calcite 1.18, and propose that we
>>>>>>>> make an RC on Monday.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> There are a lot of PRs (107 open currently)[1]. I can’t get through 
>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>> all myself, so I will need help reviewing & merging them. (If you are
>>>>>>>> committer, look in the JIRA case to see whether someone has begun 
>>>>>>>> reviewing
>>>>>>>> the PR. I am reviewing several right now.)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Even with help, we are not going to get to all PRs. That will have to 
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>> OK; it has been too long since we had a release, and we just don’t have
>>>>>>>> enough active committers to deal with the number of incoming 
>>>>>>>> contributions.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 6, 2018, at 4:24 AM, Michael Mior <m...@joinbunch.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Not strictly necessary I believe, but I know there's a desire to 
>>>>>>>>> upgrade
>>>>>>>>> Jetty in Calcite that can't happen until the Avatica release, so it 
>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>> be nice to see that happen first.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Le lun. 5 nov. 2018 à 16:31, Francis Chuang 
>>>>>>>>> <francischu...@apache.org> a
>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I think we should consider releasing new versions of Calcite and 
>>>>>>>>>> Avatica
>>>>>>>>>> soon, especially with the Thanksgiving holiday in North America and
>>>>>>>>>> Christmas + New Year later in December/January coming up.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Am I correct to assume that we need to release Avatica 1.13.0 before
>>>>>>>>>> Calcite 1.18.0?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> If so, I am able to be release manager for Avatica if no one else is
>>>>>>>>>> interested.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 21/10/2018 6:13 PM, Michael Mior wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for continuing to push releases forward! Unfortunately I 
>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>> able to volunteer to be release manager this time around, but I'll 
>>>>>>>>>>> try
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> set aside some time to go through some PRs.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 20, 2018, 02:21 Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> OK, it's now exactly 3 months since 1.17. I think it's time. I 
>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>> we should aim for a first RC a week from today (Friday 26th 
>>>>>>>>>>>> October).
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we have a volunteer to be release manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, there are lots of PRs to review and merge. Please help out 
>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>> that task, committers.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 11:00 AM Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We’ll be sure to get PRs into the release. If you like, you can 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> JIRA case depend on those 3 cases - that will remind us.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Other contributors: You can do that also, but only if you have a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PR
>>>>>>>>>>>> that you believe is ready to submit.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 20, 2018, at 8:18 AM, Andrew Pilloud
>>>>>>>>>>>> <apill...@google.com.INVALID> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Beam has a few JIRAs we'd like to see make the next release 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (which
>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enable us to replace 11k lines of code with calls to Calcite). 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They
>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have open PRs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2404 Accessing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> structured-types is not implemented by the runtime
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2529 linq4j 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>> promote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integer to floating point when generating function calls
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2571 TRIM does 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>> match
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the behavior of most SQL implementations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andrew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 6:38 PM Kevin Risden <kris...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9/25 should be the GA release of JDK 11 according to [1]. Would 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>> good to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ensure that the next release is compatible with it. We should 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be in
>>>>>>>>>>>> good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shape but would be a good release note too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/11/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kevin Risden
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018, 20:56 Francis Chuang <
>>>>>>>> francischu...@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For avatica, there are currently 6 open PRs. A few of them 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appear
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocked due to incompatibilities with JDK or something else.
>>>>>>>> Perhaps
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> situation has now changed and we can get those in for 1.13.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20/09/2018 9:26 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have logged
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2576 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2576> Release
>>>>>>>> Avatica
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.13
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2575 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2575> Release
>>>>>>>> Calcite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.18.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 19, 2018, at 4:19 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Calcite 1.17 was released on 20th July (2 months ago) and 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there have been almost 100 commits.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone have constraints on when 1.18 should be released?
>>>>>>>> (My
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> opinion: we should aim for 3 months after 1.17, and therefore 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> need
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an RC before 10th October.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone have any JIRA cases that they would like to get 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1.18
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but they have not yet finished?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who would like to be release manager?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we need a new Avatica release before we make this Calcite
>>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2467 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2467> describes 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>> reason
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to do so: jetty versions. Also, it would be nice if both 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>>>>>> used
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new parent POM (see
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2486 <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2486>) but it’s 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> essential.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Julian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>> 

Reply via email to