Hi all,

I have created a build for Apache Calcite Avatica 1.16.0, release
candidate 0.

Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.

You can read the release notes here:
https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/blob/204d58849ecdf2ef639308edba74f416311f7d88/site/_docs/history.md

The commit to be voted upon:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite-avatica.git;a=commit;h=204d58849ecdf2ef639308edba74f416311f7d88

Its hash is 204d58849ecdf2ef639308edba74f416311f7d88

Tag:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite-avatica.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/avatica-1.16.0-rc0

The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-avatica-1.16.0-rc0
(revision 37139)

The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
b54066d3b67e1f47d8f3af74466155350bfa92e938f0f442383efd8abb49993c8aee3aca258a9cc2ebb347a6b2f9473c05221da52dd56971478e7989952a7393
*apache-calcite-avatica-1.16.0-src.tar.gz
0739d77ad6bfebd903ddd9fb72d03540f91676ec967ea0a0941e7b428f4045b9d7dab8803c499d3d681fd9c28a79a5feeb850eadcda46055174efc5e459b3661
*apache-calcite-avatica-1.16.0-src.zip

A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1070/org/apache/calcite/

Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/francischuang.asc
https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS

N.B.
To create the jars and test Apache Calcite Avatica: "./gradlew build -Prelease -PskipSigning".

If you do not have a Java environment available, you can run the tests
using docker. To do so, install docker and docker-compose, then run
"docker-compose run test" from the root of the directory.

Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite Avatica 1.16.0.

The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
least three +1 PMC votes are cast.

[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.16.0
[ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...


Here is my vote:

+1 (binding)

Francis

Reply via email to