Hi Ruben,
We use RepeateUnion in our downstream project to process tree structures.
And for us, it works like charm.
I looked through the proposed changes and I find them reasonable.
RelBuilder API is the same, so, most client code should still work.

Thanks for your contribution!

Regards,
Igor
On 18 Jan 2022, 10:35 +0200, Ruben Q L <[email protected]>, wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback Julian.
> I will take a look at the Morel issue.
>
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 11:12 PM Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the heads up. There was a good reason that we marked
> > RepeatUnion experimental: so that we can make these improvements without
> > anyone complaining. I welcome these changes evolving RepeatUnion into a
> > more useful feature.
> >
> > By the way, in Morel I am having some deep discussions about the best way
> > to surface ‘recursive’ or ‘iterative’ or ‘fixed point’ queries should be
> > surfaced in a relational/functional language [1]. Morel’s goal is to
> > execute programs both locally and via Calcite relational algebra, so Morel
> > will at some point use RepeatUnion.
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/julianhyde/morel/issues/81 <
> > https://github.com/julianhyde/morel/issues/81>
> >
> > > On Jan 17, 2022, at 8:49 AM, Ruben Q L <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello everyone,
> > >
> > > I am not sure if anyone else (apart from my downstream project) is using
> > > RepeatUnion and associated operators to build recursive unions
> > > (experimental feature implemented via [1]), but just in case: I am
> > > considering a patch to fix some known issues ([2] & [3]) on the current
> > > implementation.
> > > This patch might potentially break the current contract of this operator,
> > > so if you think that you may be impacted by this change, please do not
> > > hesitate to take a look at the PR [4] and contribute to the discussion in
> > > there.
> > >
> > > Thanks and best regards,
> > > Ruben
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2812
> > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3673
> > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4054
> > > [4] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2690
> >
> >

Reply via email to