Infix cast comes from Postgres. Can someone find a table of operator precedence in Postgres? Perhaps write a test case involving operators with slightly higher and lower precedence, so we can check that Calcite is consistent.
> On Oct 4, 2022, at 10:20 AM, Itiel Sadeh <iti...@sqreamtech.com.INVALID> > wrote: > > Hello, > > I've encountered weird parsing of infix cast with the babel parser, where > given the > following query: > SELECT -1 :: INT FROM t; > It will parse it as > UNARY_MINUS( CAST( 1 AS INT )), > while i've expected it to be > CAST(-1 AS INT) > > As i've looked at the code I saw that the precedence of the INFIX_CAST is > 94, and the precedence of the UNARY_MINUS is 80. > > Is there a reason for the INFIX_CAST's precedence to be that high? Other > binary operators such as BINARY_PLUS have precedence of 40. > > Thanks, > > Itiel
