Hello, I conducted debugging, and the result is as you said. I may need
some time to think about how to modify this part of the code. Thank you
very much for your suggestion.

Best regards,
Cancai Cai

Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 于2024年3月11日周一 21:09写道:

> I didn't go deep into CALCITE-6259, so I might not able to give you
> the precise solution / code. Generally, you can add your operator
> table in front of the standard operator table, or just leave the
> standard operator table out, that would meet the requirement that you
> want to "override" a standard operator.
>
> Cancai Cai <caic68...@gmail.com> 于2024年3月10日周日 17:43写道:
> >
> > It seems like I can't find a suitable way to solve this problem, can you
> > give me some suggestions?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Cancai Cai
> >
> > Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 于2024年3月5日周二 19:26写道:
> >
> > > It's not a class loading problem, it's an operator lookup mechanism,
> > > which is a by design behavior, you can see details here[1]. If there
> > > are multiple candidates in the result of operator lookup, the first
> > > one will be returned.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/d64ee0037db7abacdfcd4e774072f5e3fb8f2998/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/sql/SqlUtil.java#L494-L517
> > >
> > > Cancai Cai <caic68...@gmail.com> 于2024年3月5日周二 16:53写道:
> > > >
> > > > Hello, everyone in the calcite community.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure if I should ask this question.
> > > >
> > > > In the process of fixing CALCITE-6259
> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6259>, I found that I
> > > > defined a log10_MS function in SqlLibraryOperators to simulate the
> > > behavior
> > > > of the log function in mysql, but the
> ReturnTypes.DOUBLE_FORCE_NULLABLE I
> > > > set was not Effective, its return value still complies with the
> > > ReturnTypes
> > > > of the LOG10 function in SqlStdOperatorTable. It seems to be a class
> > > > loading conflict. I tried to modify sqlkind, but it didn’t take
> effect.
> > > Is
> > > > there any good way?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you all.
> > > >
> > > > Best wishes.
> > > > Cancai Cai
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Benchao Li
> > >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best,
> Benchao Li
>

Reply via email to