Hello, could you also include CALCITE-6570 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6570 ?
пн, 16 сент. 2024 г. в 07:21, Cancai Cai <caic68...@gmail.com>: > > If https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6544 is not a bug, then > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6527 is ready. > > I noticed that some of the jira cases above are my responsibility. I will > follow up during this period and try to merge them into version 1.38.0. > > Best wishes, > Cancai Cai > > > 2024年9月16日 06:26，Mihai Budiu <mbu...@gmail.com> 写道： > > > > You have not listed CALCITE-4918, > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4918 for which I have a PR, > > which I think you have approved using comments > > https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/3947, but not using the official > > "approve" button. > > > > I was hoping other people would weigh on this design and implementation. > > > > Mihai > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> > > Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2024 3:12 PM > > To: dev@calcite.apache.org <dev@calcite.apache.org> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.38.0 > > > > I've logged https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6582 to > > track the release. > > > > There are 26 open bugs [1] marked to fix for 1.38. I have organized > > them into 5 categories. Can people please review and merge those in > > category 1? To get a release vote next week, so let's get busy > > reviewing and merging bugs this week. > > > > Category 1. The following have a PR available that seems close to > > ready. If these are good, let's get these merged! > > * CALCITE-6572 Add more tests for NULL arguments to TO_CHAR functions > > * CALCITE-6554 nested correlated sub-query in aggregation does not > > have inner correlation variable bound to inner projection > > * CALCITE-6550 Improve SQL function overloading > > * CALCITE-6343 AS alias operator strips MEASUREness from measures > > * CALCITE-6161 The equalsDeep of sqlCall should compare sqlOperator's > > sqlKind > > * CALCITE-6226 Wrong ISOWEEK and no ISOYEAR on BigQuery FORMAT_DATE > > * CALCITE-2067 RexLiteral cannot represent accurately floating point > > values, including NaN, Infinity > > * CALCITE-5156 Support implicit number type cast for IN Sub-query > > * CALCITE-6071 RexCall should carry source position information for > > runtime error reporting > > * CALCITE-6498 Elasticsearch multi-field mappings do not work > > * CALCITE-6522 MAP_KEYS and MAP_VALUES function should throw if a key > > value is null > > * CALCITE-6020 SqlToRelConverter should not replace windowed SUM with > > equivalent expression using SUM0 > > * CALCITE-4512 GROUP BY expression with argument name same with SELECT > > field and alias causes validation error > > > > Category 2. The following cases have a draft PR. Is it ready for 1.38? > > * CALCITE-6431 Implement the SINGLE_VALUE aggregation in > > HiveSqlDialect And SparkSQLDialect > > * CALCITE-6300 Function MAP_VALUES/MAP_KEYS gives exception when > > mapVauleType and mapKeyType not equals map Biggest mapKeytype or > > mapValueType > > > > Category 3. Need to decide whether to accept or close: > > * CALCITE-6207 Improve connection resource in JDBCUtils > > * CALCITE-6411 Support Collect in ToLogicalConverter > > * CALCITE-6352 The map_contains_key function may return true when the > > key and mapkeytype types are different. > > > > Category 4. The following seem to have no PR. Are there any worth > > holding the train for? > > * CALCITE-6277 About the processing of +infinity parameters and > > -infinity parameters in math function > > * CALCITE-6203 Avg operator test in SparkAdapterTest > > * CALCITE-6326 Add LOG10 and LN function (enabled in Mysql, Spark library) > > * CALCITE-6259 The implementation of the Log library operator does not > > match the actual dialect behavior. > > * CALCITE-5541 Upgrade JavaCC > > * CALCITE-6469 Join on condition generates wrong plan when the > > condition is IN sub-query > > * CALCITE-6463 alias generation issue about correlated subquery handling > > > > Category 5. Are there any more cases with PR ready (i.e. potential category > > 1)? > > > > Julian > > > > [1] > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20CALCITE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.38.0%20and%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20 > > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2024 at 6:20 PM Xiong Duan <xi...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >> +1 We start voting in about ten days. We will merge the almost-ready PR. > >> > >> Cancai Cai <caic68...@gmail.com> 于2024年9月14日周六 08:55写道： > >>> > >>> +1，There are still many valuable PRs in Calcite. We can try to merge them > >>> before 1.38. > >>> > >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite/pulls > >>> > >>> Best wishes, > >>> Cancai Cai > >>> > >>>> 2024年9月14日 04:04，Julian Hyde <jhyde.apa...@gmail.com> 写道： > >>>> > >>>> +1 we’re ready for a release, and I’m happy to be RM. > >>>> > >>>> I think we could have a first RC and vote in about ten days. What do > >>>> others feel about timing? > >>>> > >>>> Julian > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Sep 13, 2024, at 4:58 AM, Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Last release date is 2024-05-06, sorry for the typo. > >>>>> > >>>>> Benchao Li <libenc...@apache.org> 于2024年9月13日周五 19:52写道： > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It's been a bit more than 4 months since our last release (2023-05-06) > >>>>>> [1] and there are currently almost 150 new commits in main branch. Per > >>>>>> our > >>>>>> tradition of producing one release every 2-3 months, I think it's time > >>>>>> to consider for next release now. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> According to [2], the following release managers would be: > >>>>>> - 1.38.0 Julian Hyde > >>>>>> - 1.39.0 Stamatis Zampetakis (or maybe 1.40.0 depending on the timing) > >>>>>> - 1.40.0 Hongyu Guo > >>>>>> - 1.41.0 Jing Zhang (she said 1.39.0 in the ML, but according to the > >>>>>> order of the email, the next one should be 1.41.0) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] https://calcite.apache.org/news/2024/05/06/release-1.37.0/ > >>>>>> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/kx56c4ow50g50hx2y8ybp631jmtnwnj6 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Best, > >>>>>> Benchao Li > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> > >>>>> Best, > >>>>> Benchao Li > >>>> > >>> >
