The maven repo has been fixed in the meantime.
We could still upgrade Kerby, unless there is a reason to stick to the old
version.

Istvan

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 3:01 PM Istvan Toth <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thank you!
>
> TIL that maven-metadata.xml is used for looking up version ranges.
>
> Upgrading to the latest and greatest Kerby also solved the problem for me.
> I prefer that to adding a transitive dependency management entry that may
> come back and bite us later.
>
> Opened CALCITE-6828 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6828>
> and https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/278 for the kerby
> version bump.
>
> Istvan
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 2:27 PM Stamatis Zampetakis <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> There is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6827 for the
>> broken build. It can possibly do the trick for avatica as well.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 9:32 AM Istvan Toth <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > BTW Avatica cannot be compiled right now,
>> >
>> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/net/minidev/json-smart/maven-metadata.xml
>> > is broken on maven-central.
>> >
>> > Istvan
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 3:51 PM Chris Dennis <[email protected]
>> .invalid>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > I have rebased https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/272
>> onto
>> > > the ‘merge’ of 274. Ready for review/merge as appropriate.
>> > >
>> > > Chris
>> > >
>> > > From: Istvan Toth <[email protected]>
>> > > Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 at 4:17 AM
>> > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>> > > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Avatica 1.26.0
>> > > Thank you.
>> > >
>> > > CALCITE-6588 has been mostly done. It is only blocked by CALCITE-5136
>> ,
>> > > which is marked as a dependency for it.
>> > >
>> > > The deprecations are resolved by
>> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/272   and
>> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/274   .
>> > > (which are conflicting, so
>> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/272   needs a rebase
>> after
>> > > https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/274   has been merged)
>> > >
>> > > Istvan
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2025 at 8:52 AM Francis Chuang <
>> [email protected]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hey everyone,
>> > > >
>> > > > Just a quick check-in for this release. I think we're quite close
>> to rc0
>> > > > for voting, we just need to get a few issues over the line.
>> > > >
>> > > > Can community members please review these PRs?
>> > > > - https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/274
>> > > > - https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/274
>> > > > - https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/275
>> > > >
>> > > > Would anyone be interested in contributing a PR for CALCITE-6588 [1]
>> > > > (Support JDK 23 and Guava 33.3.0 in Avatica)?
>> > > >
>> > > > Francis
>> > > >
>> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6588
>> > > >
>> > > > On 29/01/2025 8:06 pm, Istvan Toth wrote:
>> > > > > At least half of those deprecations (and most of the ugliest
>> > > > suppressions)
>> > > > > are related to the old Http Client Configurable interfaces which
>> are
>> > > not
>> > > > > implemented by anything in our codebase.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > We could either completely remove them (which technically breaks
>> > > > backwards
>> > > > > compatibility with users implementing custom http clients), or
>> > > > un-deprecate
>> > > > > them.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I would also look at  the non-SPNEGO related apache httpclient
>> > > > > deprecations, to see if they can be fixed properly instead of
>> > > > suppressing.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 6:35 PM Chris Dennis <
>> [email protected]
>> > > > .invalid>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Seemed like a relatively simple mechanical change:
>> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/272
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Let me know if anything is inappropriate. Note that due to 1.8
>> source
>> > > > >> compatibility there’s some fairly ugly FQCN references that
>> cannot be
>> > > > >> avoided.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Chris
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> From: Julian Hyde <[email protected]>
>> > > > >> Date: Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 10:33 AM
>> > > > >> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
>> > > > >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Avatica 1.26.0
>> > > > >> Why defer 5136? Ignoring deprecation warnings hurt us in the
>> past. We
>> > > > >> logged 5136 so that it wouldn’t happen again. I think it’s ok to
>> > > > suppress
>> > > > >> deprecation warnings that we know are ok, so that we can have the
>> > > build
>> > > > >> fail if new deprecation warnings occur.
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> On Jan 28, 2025, at 4:00 AM, Istvan Toth <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Thanks to Stamatis and Chris the JDK23 support is in.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> According to the 1.26.0 release ticket(CALCITE-6589), there are
>> two
>> > > > more
>> > > > >>> tasks left:
>> > > > >>> * A trivial Guava update
>> > > > >> https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/270
>> > > > >>> * and CALCITE-5136 Avatica build (or CI) must fail if there are
>> > > > >> deprecation
>> > > > >>> warnings
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Some of the deprecation warnings can only be fixed by brute
>> force
>> > > > >>> suppression,
>> > > > >>> so I'd suggest removing CALCITE-5136 from the 1.26.0 release
>> > > blockers.
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Istvan
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 10:54 PM Francis Chuang <
>> > > > >> [email protected]>
>> > > > >>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> Can community members please help with reviewing this PR?
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/251
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> It's a pretty big change, your help is much appreciated :)
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>> On 17/01/2025 12:48 am, Istvan Toth wrote:
>> > > > >>>>> Thank you @Francis Chuang <[email protected]> for
>> driving
>> > > the
>> > > > >>>>> process.
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> The one remaining non-trivial ticket is CALCITE-6590 for
>> Java23+
>> > > > >> support.
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> It was discussed on this thread, and on the ticket.
>> > > > >>>>> I also consider the PR for that ready for review.
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 9:30 PM Francis Chuang <
>> > > > >> [email protected]
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> Hey everyone,
>> > > > >>>>>> Hope you had a great Christmas and New Year!
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> I would like to continue the process of releasing Avatica
>> 1.26.0.
>> > > > Can
>> > > > >>>>>> community members please consider reviewing the following
>> PRs?
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> - https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/264
>> > > > >>>>>> - https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/261
>> > > > >>>>>> - https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/257
>> > > > >>>>>> - https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/251
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> Francis
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>> On 22/11/2024 7:54 am, Francis Chuang wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>> We currently have 7 PRs that needs to be reviewed and
>> merged for
>> > > > >> 1.26.0
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> Can community members please help review them?
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> If community members have suggestions for resolving these 2
>> > > > >> (especially
>> > > > >>>>>>> the gradle issue), it would be much appreciated:
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> - https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/257
>> > > > >>>>>>> - https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/264
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>> On 1/11/2024 11:48 pm, Istvan Toth wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> checkstyle is only used at runtime.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> Sorry, I meant build time.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> I also opened  CALCITE-6661 to update the shadow plugin
>> and asm
>> > > > >>>> library,
>> > > > >>>>>>>> shading Jackson 2.15.4 seems to require it.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> Istvan
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 9:32 PM Francis Chuang <
>> > > > >>>>>> [email protected]>
>> > > > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Thank you for opening these PRs, Istvan.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Can someone please review these changes?
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On 1/11/2024 12:28 am, Istvan Toth wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> I have opened the following component update tickets
>> with PRs:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-6656 <
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6656
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Update
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> owasp plugin from 5.2.2 to 10.0.4 in Avatica
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-6657 <
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6657
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Update
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> checkstyle from 10.3.2 to 10.19.0 in Avatica
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-6658 <
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6658
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Update
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Jackson from 2.15.2 to 2.15.4 in Avatica
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-6659 <
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6659
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Update
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Jetty from 9.4.44.v20210927 to 9.4.56.v20240826 in
>> Avatica
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> CALCITE-6660 <
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6660
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Update
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> protobuf-java from 3.21.9 to 3.25.5 in Avatica
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> This gets the OWASP plugin working, and updates some of
>> the
>> > > > >> reported
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> components.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Jetty and Protobuf are possibly relevant, the Jackson
>> CVE is
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> disputed and
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> probably invalid and checkstyle is only used at runtime.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Even the latest Jetty has some CVEs, but there's not
>> much we
>> > > can
>> > > > >> do
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> about
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> that.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Istvan
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 7:44 AM Istvan Toth <
>> > > [email protected]
>> > > > >
>> > > > >>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Re CALCITE-6590, I think we have agreed to go with the
>> > > > reflection
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> based
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> fix, but the PR <
>> > > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/251    >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> has
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> not been approved yet.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I need a review for the PR.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I have updated the JIRA description to match the
>> solution we
>> > > > have
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> chosen.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Istvan
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 12:13 AM Francis Chuang <
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hey everyone,
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to follow up on the open issues for Avatica
>> > > > 1.26.0.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I would like to get the following into this release:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - CALCITE-6590 - Run tests with
>> java.security.manager=allow
>> > > on
>> > > > >>>>>> JDK23+
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> in
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Avatica
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> -CALCITE-5136 - Avatica build (or CI) must fail if
>> there are
>> > > > >>>>>>>>> deprecation
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> warnings
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> - CALCITE-6588 - Support JDK 23 and Guava 33.3.0 in
>> Avatica
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Istvan, can you see if you can wrap up CALCITE-6590,
>> so the
>> > > > >> other
>> > > > >>>> 2
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> issues can be worked on?
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Francis
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 15/10/2024 3:46 pm, Francis Chuang wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Now that Calcite 1.38.0 has been released, I think
>> it's
>> > > time
>> > > > to
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> start
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> the release process for Avatica 1.26.0.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> For starters, I would like to see CALCITE-6590 [1] in
>> this
>> > > > >>>> release.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Are there any other changes the community would like
>> to see
>> > > > in
>> > > > >>>> this
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I also note that we have 12 other open PRs that could
>> > > > >> potentially
>> > > > >>>>>> be
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> reviewed and merged.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Francis
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>> https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/251
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21/09/2024 9:54 am, Julian Hyde wrote:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Pig hasn't released a new version for a long
>> time.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We should consider removing the Pig adapter at some
>> point.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also upgrade the Spark adapter to a version that uses
>> > > Hadoop
>> > > > >> 3.x
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> rather than Hadoop 2.x.
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> *Email*: [email protected]
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com    >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/    >
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <
>> https://twitter.com/cloudera
>> > >   >
>> > > > >>>> [image:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cloudera on Facebook] <
>> https://www.facebook.com/cloudera
>> > > >
>> > > > >> [image:
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cloudera on LinkedIn] <
>> > > > https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>>
>> > > > >>>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
>> > > *Email*: [email protected]
>> > > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com  >
>> > > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/  >
>> > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera  > [image:
>> > > Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera  > [image:
>> > > Cloudera
>> > > on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera  >
>> > > ------------------------------
>> > > ------------------------------
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
>> > *Email*: [email protected]
>> > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>
>> > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
>> > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
>> > Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image:
>> Cloudera
>> > on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
>> > ------------------------------
>> > ------------------------------
>>
>
>
> --
> *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
> *Email*: [email protected]
> cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>
> [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
> [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
> Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image:
> Cloudera on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
> ------------------------------
> ------------------------------
>


-- 
*István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
*Email*: [email protected]
cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>
[image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
[image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image: Cloudera
on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
------------------------------
------------------------------

Reply via email to