Folks, any chance to include
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7009 in the upcoming
release? The patch is really small, we only need to find someone with good
expertise in correlates to take a look.

-- 
Regards,
Konstantin Orlov

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 7:45 PM Alessandro Solimando <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> as announced, I would like to close the main branch in roughly 48 hours
> from now and start preparing the RC for the next release.
>
> According to this dashboard
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> >,
> there are only two unresolved tickets marked for 1.40.0:
> - CALCITE-7014 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7014>, which
> didn't receive any comments so far and I feel like it can be moved to
> 1.41.0
> - CALCITE-6887 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-6887>,
> already an approval from a committer and close to completion IMO
>
> These three tickets have good enough already associated PRs and can easily
> make it into the release, although they don't have a fixVersion set, at the
> moment:
> - CALCITE-7026 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7026>
> - CALCITE-7027 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7027>
> - CALCITE-7030 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-7030>
>
> Is there anything else that we might want to try to squeeze in into 1.40.0?
>
> Best regards,
> Alessandro
>
> Best regards,
> Alessandro
>
> On Fri, 16 May 2025 at 09:57, Stamatis Zampetakis <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Having a new release by June would be great! Thanks for starting the
> > discussion Alessandro!
> >
> > I will start a separate thread for the signing party. Let's discuss
> > here any must have items for the release and/or issues encountered
> > during the process.
> >
> > Best,
> > Stamatis
> >
> > On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 10:42 AM Alessandro Solimando
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thank you, Francis, for your quick reply, I will make sure to reach out
> > in
> > > case of problems :)
> > >
> > > Good point regarding the tz, I am located in CEST/GMT+2.
> > >
> > > If someone within my same timezone is available it's easier, but
> > otherwise
> > > I can adapt to the tz of whoever is available for the key signing.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Alessandro
> > >
> > > On Thu, 15 May 2025 at 10:27, Francis Chuang <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 I think this is a good plan.
> > > >
> > > > For the signing party, can you please let us know which timezone
> you're
> > > > in? There should be someone on this list who is in the same timezone
> > and
> > > > can sign your key.
> > > >
> > > > The instructions for making a RC[1] is pretty complete, but if you
> run
> > > > into any issues or have any questions, please post here and we can
> > help! :)
> > > >
> > > > Francis
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > https://calcite.apache.org/docs/howto.html#making-a-release-candidate
> > > >
> > > > On 15/05/2025 5:36 pm, Alessandro Solimando wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > I volunteered to be the next release manager for 1.40.0, and I
> would
> > like
> > > > > to propose the 24th-25th May as the target date for the RC.
> > > > >
> > > > > To this effect, I'd like to close modifications to the main branch
> a
> > few
> > > > > days before, say the 22nd of May, and take the time until then to
> > > > finalize
> > > > > pending work that should be included into the next release.
> > > > >
> > > > > I haven't participated in any signing party so far, so by then I
> will
> > > > need
> > > > > to have my PGP key signed by someone before the release process
> > starts.
> > > > > Shall we organize a full fledged key signing party or is there some
> > > > > lightweight process we could favor in the interest of time?
> > > > >
> > > > > Please let me know if you have any concerns with the timeline
> and/or
> > > > > suggestions for the key signing or anything else, as it's my first
> > time
> > > > as
> > > > > release manager, any form of guidance/tip is welcome!
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Alessandro
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to