Hi, >From the Hive side, we don't expose Calcite to users so we should be able to handle any breakage on our end.
Brock On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Jacques Nadeau <[email protected]> wrote: > As long as everyone is comfortable with potential API breakage in 1.1, I'm > +1 for a release as well. > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I agree. I would just like to get a release out. We’ve been talking about >> 1.0 for several months, so no one should be surprised. >> >> If anyone is struck with pangs of methodological guilt over the fact that >> we haven’t documented the public API, they are welcome to document it. >> >> Julian >> >> >> >> On Jan 14, 2015, at 3:22 PM, Vladimir Sitnikov < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > If we polish really hard and make 1.0 perfect, then we would have nothing >> > to do for 2.0 ) >> > >> > I would prefer release sooner, so we can get feedback. >> > >> > Otherwise I have no preference. >> > >> > Vladimir >> >>
