One naming convention I really like from the Google Collections library is using the plural name of a type/interface/base class as the helper class for static helper methods.
So we could rename things like ExchangeHelper to Exchanges, CamelContextHelper to CamelContexts. Much neater IMHO. These helper classes are all internal mostly for Camel implementation details; so wondering if it'd make sense to refactor them for 2.0? Thoughts? -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ Open Source Integration http://fusesource.com/
