[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=49979#action_49979
]
davsclaus edited comment on CAMEL-1373 at 2/27/09 8:22 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
camel-spring *DONE*
camel-jms *DONE*
came-http *DONE*
camel-jetty *DONE*
camel-cxf *DONE*
camel-atom *DONE*
camel-freemarker *DONE*
camel-hl7 *DONE*
camel-ibatis *DONE*
camel-irc *DONE*
camel-jcr *DONE*
camel-jdbc *DONE*
camel-jpa *DONE*
camel-restlet *DONE*
camel-rss *DONE*
camel-sql *DONE*
was (Author: davsclaus):
camel-spring *DONE*
camel-jms *DONE*
came-http *DONE*
camel-jetty *DONE*
camel-cxf *DONE*
camel-atom *DONE*
camel-freemarker *DONE*
camel-hl7 *DONE*
camel-ibatis *DONE*
camel-irc *DONE*
camel-jcr *DONE*
camel-jdbc *DONE*
camel-jpa *DONE*
camel-restlet *DONE*
camel-rss *DONE*
> Use CamelCase for Header keys instead of package name prefixes
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-1373
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1373
> Project: Apache Camel
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: camel-core
> Reporter: Claus Ibsen
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
> Fix For: 2.0-M1
>
>
> We have agreed as part of the 2.0 API rework to use CamelCase header keys.
> Currently keys using dots violates the JMS spec and other protocols might
> have problems with them as well.
> And Camel should of course use CamelCase :)
> And they are also easier to read, and less words to type.
> There is a discussion on the dev forum about it - title "Camel 2.0 - Keys for
> header problem"
> Cant like using Nabble as they havent changed to TLP domain
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
