[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=51449#action_51449
]
Christopher Hunt commented on CAMEL-1570:
-----------------------------------------
Hi Claus,
I'm happy develop a unit test for this of course. In the first
instance, can you please review my proposal and code submission? If it
looks good then I'll proceed with the unit test and update the wiki
once committed.
Kind regards,
Christopher
> Jetty component is unable to be configured for security
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-1570
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1570
> Project: Apache Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-jetty
> Affects Versions: 1.6.0, 2.0-M1
> Environment: NA
> Reporter: Christopher Hunt
> Attachments: JettyHttpComponent.java.diff, JettyHttpEndpoint.java.diff
>
>
> The Jetty component is presently unable to be configured for security. A
> general purpose mechanism so that the Jetty component can be configured would
> be useful. The following URI based option is proposed:
> ||Name||Default Value||Description||
> |handlers|null| Specifies a comma delimited set of instances in your Registry
> (such as your Spring ApplicationContext). These instances are added to the
> Jetty servlet context|
> Here is an example URI:
> {code}
> jetty:http://0.0.0.0:9080/MyService?handlers=securityHandler
> {code}
> This could refer to something like the following Spring configuration:
> {code}
> <!-- Jetty Security handling -->
> <bean id="userRealm" class="org.mortbay.jetty.plus.jaas.JAASUserRealm">
> <property name="name" value="tracker-users" />
> <property name="loginModuleName" value="ldaploginmodule" />
> </bean>
> <bean id="constraint" class="org.mortbay.jetty.security.Constraint">
> <property name="name" value="BASIC" />
> <property name="roles" value="tracker-users" />
> <property name="authenticate" value="true" />
> </bean>
> <bean id="constraintMapping"
> class="org.mortbay.jetty.security.ConstraintMapping">
> <property name="constraint" ref="constraint" />
> <property name="pathSpec" value="/*" />
> </bean>
> <bean id="securityHandler"
> class="org.mortbay.jetty.security.SecurityHandler">
> <property name="userRealm" ref="userRealm" />
> <property name="constraintMappings" ref="constraintMapping" />
> </bean>
> {code}
> I have attached proposed changes to the 1.6 branch. I imagine that 2.0 should
> be quite similar.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
