[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=51633#action_51633 ]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-1606: ------------------------------------ Okay gotta it sorted. The other definitions that uses blocks handle the push/block/end by hand - for instance TryDefintion. I guess this makes sense allowing your definition to be in full control how block should be applied. Got it working now with synchronize > Java RouteBuilder with blocks seems to not work correctly with end() > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CAMEL-1606 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1606 > Project: Apache Camel > Issue Type: Bug > Components: camel-core > Affects Versions: 1.6.0, 2.0-M1 > Reporter: Claus Ibsen > Assignee: Claus Ibsen > Fix For: 2.0.0 > > > Working on the new DSL for onComplete, onFailure callbacks for Exchange when > its done. > The route below is to define a subroute (the block with sycnhronize). > {code} > from("direct:start") > .synchronize() > .to("mock:before") > .process(complete) > .to("mock:after") > .end() > .transform(constant("Bye World")) > .to("mock:result"); > {code} > So the otuer route should be: > from -> sync -> transform -> mock:result > and sync sub route should be: > sync -> mock:before -> process -> mock:after > But with the current codebase the end() is not handling the block correctly. > It ends with the outer route being incl. the sub route: > from -> sync -> mock:before -> process -> mock:after -> transform -> > mock:result > Spring DSL does not have this issue as it uses XML tags to indicate sub > routes and where they start/end -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.