[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=52324#action_52324
]
Stephen Gargan commented on CAMEL-1708:
---------------------------------------
That's strange, as I did run the sourcecheck and cleared out any warnings it
gave. I'm also using the eclipse formatting settings from the etc/eclipse
directory. Are the rules there not the latest? Anyhow, I understand though that
changes to the comments are just noisy in a patch. Thetwo replacements should
be clean. I'll up the line length to 140 to see if that helps.
rgds,
ste
> Allow for the selection of Routes during package scan using Ant like Path
> matching
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-1708
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-1708
> Project: Apache Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-spring
> Affects Versions: 2.0-M1
> Reporter: Stephen Gargan
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: core-patch.txt, patch.txt, patch.txt, spring-patch.txt
>
>
> Attached is a patch to allow for Routes to be included and excluded using ant
> like path patterns. Packages to be scanned are supplied as ususal, but
> whether the Route classes discovered in these packages are included is now
> also controlled by sets of include and exclude filters.
> This mechanism is defined as a subelement of the CamelContext definition in
> Spring context as follows.
> <camelContext xmlns="http://camel.apache.org/schema/spring";>
> <packageScan>
> <packages>org.apache.camel.spring.config.scan</packages>
> <exclude>**/*Excluded*</exclude>
> <include>**/*Included*</include>
> </packageScan>
> ....
> </camelContext>
> It leverages Spring's AntPathMatcher to match fully qualified class names
> against the supplied patterns. The existing <package></package> definition
> has been deprecated and will emit a log message suggesting the new mechanism.
> This patch also includes code to allow Routes to be selectively excluded via
> class matching at test time. i.e.
> public class RouteExcludingSpringTest extends SpringTestSupport {
> @Override
> protected AbstractXmlApplicationContext createApplicationContext() {
> return new ClassPathXmlApplicationContext(new String[]
> {"routes-context.xml"}, getRouteExcludingApplicationContext());
> }
> ....
> @Override
> protected Class excludeRoute() {
> return MyExcludedRouteBuilder.class;
> }
> }
> I hope you can find this usefull. I'll be happy to make any changes you might
> suggest.
> rgds,
> Stephen
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
