[ 
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-3117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Christopher Hunt resolved CAMEL-3117.
-------------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 2.5.0
       Resolution: Fixed

My patch resolves this issue and now provides a unit test. However I did just 
look at the unit test again and I think that line 36 of CxfBeanTest could 
benefit from a not-null check (even though no issue presented itself) i.e.

{code}
if (beanEndpoint.getProviders() != null) {
    if (beanEndpoint.getProviders().size() == 2) {
        testedEndpointWithProviders = true;
        break;
    } else if (beanEndpoint.getProviders().size() != 0) {
        fail("Unexpected number of providers present");
    }
}
{code}

> cxfbean and cxfrs components should honour jax-rs providers in the bean 
> registry
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-3117
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-3117
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-cxf
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.0
>         Environment: cxfrs and cxfbean
>            Reporter: Christopher Hunt
>            Assignee: Willem Jiang
>             Fix For: 2.5.0
>
>         Attachments: providers.diff
>
>
> The cxfbean component does not presently provide a means of using custom 
> providers i.e. those customised JAX-RS classes that are annotated with the 
> @Provider declaration. 
> My recommendation is that objects instantiated in the bean container from 
> classes annotated with @Provider are automatically registered for use by the 
> cxfrs and cxfbean components. This includes message body writers/readers and 
> parameter handlers i.e. anything that can be presently expressed in the 
> cxf:rsServer/providers element.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to