On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 7:15 PM, Richard Kettelerij <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I was wondering, why isn't the test coverage of Camel measured during Hudson > builds? This is easily done using Cobertura. I think we all agree that > (unit)test coverage is very important. Monitoring this in Hudson and Sonar ( > http://nemo.sonarsource.org) is convenient. It's not that Camel doesn't have > any unit tests, 6000+ sweet :-) >
Yeah Sonartype used to do coverage tests, but I think they disabled that when we started to have many unit tests. Now its almost 6500 and it takes a fair bit of time to run. And when there is code coverage there is a little overhead as well. We run it once in a while locally to detect gaps in the most important components. > Regards, > Richard > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: [email protected] Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
