If you have the karma, please! When we got the build failures, I asked Brett about having a Camel profile and if I could get karma on sonar, but didn't get an answer. Don't know if he didn't notice my request, or what the reason was for him ignoring it. I chose not to push it.
Thanks, Hadrian On Feb 7, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > Hadrian, > > I believe the sonar build for Camel is using the default "Sun checks with > Findbugs" setup. I could change that to use the Camel rules for Checkstyle > and PMD. > > The CXF build is now using the CXF rulesets for both. It jumped the > compliance level from ~85% to ~96% as we didn't feel a bunch of the > PMC/Checkstyle rules were really violations of anything. > > Dan > > > On Monday 07 February 2011 12:33:05 am Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The ASF is running a pilot instance of Sonar [1] and, thanks to Brett >> Porter, Camel was included. After four failed builds, Olivier Lamy pitched >> in and made Chuck Norris happy on the fifth try. >> >> Therefore [drum roll] I am happy to introduce the first sonar report of >> Camel [2]. Feel free to take a look at the many things we can improve in >> camel. (I am willing to bet Christian Schneider will jump on the package >> dependencies). There are a bunch of low hanging fruits, such as redundant >> throws and collapsible if statements that could quickly improve our rating >> from an already respectable 78.9%. >> >> Needless to say, it becomes even more important to keep our builds stable >> and keep working on reducing testing time, as building Camel sucks over 5 >> hours of scarce build time in the sonar environment. >> >> Many thanks to Brett, Olivier and INFRA for the help. >> Hadrian >> >> [1] http://sonar.apache.org/ >> [2] http://sonar.apache.org/dashboard/index/37401 > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dk...@apache.org > http://dankulp.com/blog
