Hi You should generally use the user mailing list for questions on Camel. Do you mind posting your mail again there?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Thomas Neuböck <thomas.neubo...@infor.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to use the camel tracer functionality - in our application - to > produce logging data, which I'd like to take as input data for a process > mining tool. > For this it's basically necessary to produce per event an entry in the > protocol structure (works as shown in the trace example). Per Case, each > event should get the same(!!!) CaseID and some event dependent information. > > My first thought was to use the provided Exchange-ID as my valid case-id. But > as my tests has shown, the exchange id is not stable in one single case (e.g. > using a splitter and aggregator). Now I'm wondering if camel is able to > provide me a valid case-id for the events of an case? > > Could anyone gives me a hint? > > Actually I've implemented a appropriate TraceEventHandler and > TraceEventMessage. As temporary solution I've implemented a routine which > puts a case-id in the header of the message if no correlation-id is known or > use the case-id if there is a correlation-id. My tests has shown that the > first message has no correlation-id (incrementing a class variable), all > following has one. I'm not sure if this rule for every possible situation > holds. > > > Thank you in advance. > Thomas > > -- Claus Ibsen ----------------- FuseSource Email: cib...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/
