If we are using enums, what kind of benefit can we get compare to use
class or interface ?
+1 to align this.
Willem
On 5/24/11 1:08 AM, Fernando Ribeiro wrote:
Claus, anyone?
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Fernando Ribeiro<
webmas...@fernandoribeiro.eti.br> wrote:
Me neither, but agree we should align this, may also use enums, as JDK 1.4
was already dropped, what do you think, everybody?
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Christian Müller<
christian.muel...@gmail.com> wrote:
We have classes and interfaces, e.g.:
interface --> org.apache.camel.component.cxf.CxfConstants
class --> org.apache.camel.component.jms.JmsConstants
We should align this. At present, I don't have any preferences.
Christian
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Fernando Ribeiro<
webmas...@fernandoribeiro.eti.br> wrote:
Any feedback yet? Thanks.
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Fernando Ribeiro<
webmas...@fernandoribeiro.eti.br> wrote:
All,
Is there any agreement here about whether we use interfaces, classes
or
enums for constants? If so, are there naming conventions that we use
or
would like to use going forward?
Thanks,
Fernando
--
Willem
----------------------------------
FuseSource
Web: http://www.fusesource.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English)
http://jnn.javaeye.com (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Connect at CamelOne May 24-26
The Open Source Integration Conference
http://camelone.com
