Hi all,
currently we have several ways of using / offering a CXF service with camel:
- Camel transport for CXF
- cxf: component
- cxfbean: component
- cxfrs: component
The camel transport is useful as it is a very thin layer compared to the
other variants. Additionally it allows to reuse experience from cxf on
how to setup an endpoint.
The cxfbean: component is quite convenient so it makes sense to have it.
The cxfrs: component also seems to be quit econvenient for users.
The cxf: component is very verbose and seems to be used almost exactly
as the original cxf way to describe a service. So I propose to remove
this component. As a migration path I propose users use either the camel
transport for cxf or the cxfbean component.
What do you think?
Christian
--
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de
Open Source Architect
Talend Application Integration Division http://www.talend.com
