[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13053922#comment-13053922
 ] 

Ashwin Karpe edited comment on CAMEL-4055 at 6/23/11 3:34 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

I looked at the submitted patch and everything looks good. The patch has now 
been committed to the codestream as revision "r1138929"

Ioannis, Thanks for your submission.

Cheers,

Ashwin...

      was (Author: akarpe):
    I looked at the submitted patch and everything looks good. The patch has 
been committed to the codestram as revision "r1138929"

Ioannis, Thanks for your submission.

Cheers,

Ashwin...

Ashwin...
  
> Hazelcast should use CamelCase keys for its headers
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-4055
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4055
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-hazelcast
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.0
>            Reporter: Claus Ibsen
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.9.0
>
>         Attachments: CAMEL-4055.patch
>
>
> Its an idiom that Camel components that supports headers to control its 
> actions should use CamelCase for its keys, eg CamelHazelcastOperation. 
> Also it would be great that if camel-hazelcast would remove the control 
> headers after usage, eg operation type and objectId. Then those headers is 
> not propagated during route as they was only intended as input for the 
> hazelcast endpoint.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to