Single dist +1, sounds awesome. On Jun 23, 2011, at 7:11 AM, Eric Johnson wrote:
> +1 to a single source distro in a zip file. > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> +1 from me as well for single source. >> I also believe zip is better than tgz. This would avoid many Windows users >> assuming that a Windows version of the source distro doesn't exist imho. >> >> Hadrian >> >> On 06/23/2011 06:19 AM, Jon Anstey wrote: >>> >>> +1 for a single source disto. Though maybe we could have a zip file >>> instead >>> of the tgz? Not sure if Windows can handle tgz OOTB. >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Richard Kettelerij< >>> richardkettele...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm fine with this, one source archive should be enough. Like Donald said >>>> most IDE's can handle both file types (although .zip is more common). >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Claus Ibsen<claus.ib...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 to speed up the assembly part. That usually seems to take too long >>>> >>>> time >>>>> >>>>> :) >>>>> >>>>> I wonder if we need to build -javadoc JARs (if we do that) ? >>>>> Do people use them? Don't your IDE grab the javadoc from the -src JARs? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Claus Ibsen >>>>> ----------------- >>>>> FuseSource >>>>> Email: cib...@fusesource.com >>>>> Web: http://fusesource.com >>>>> Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews >>>>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ >>>>> Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Principle Technical Writer > FuseSource > Phone: (781) 280-4174 > E-Mail: emjohn...@fusesource.com > Blog: http://documentingit.blogspot.com/ > Twitter: finnmccumial
