[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13062485#comment-13062485
]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-4202:
------------------------------------
If there is an use case for using persistent queues that are *exclusive* for
the Camel consumer, then we can avoid using JMSMessageSelector and thus be as
fast as temporary queues.
> camel-jms - Using request/reply over persistent queues should be faster
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAMEL-4202
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4202
> Project: Camel
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: camel-jms
> Affects Versions: 2.7.1
> Reporter: Claus Ibsen
> Assignee: Claus Ibsen
> Fix For: 2.8.0
>
>
> See nabble
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/slow-reply-for-jms-component-when-url-contains-replyTo-tp4563075p4563075.html
> When using persistent replyTo queues for request/reply over JMS, then the
> ReplyManager should be faster to pickup replies.
> The default spring-jms timeout is 1 sec and it impacts the performance.
> Likewise the receiveTimeout should not be set on the reply managers as that
> does not apply here.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
