[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13062485#comment-13062485 ]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-4202: ------------------------------------ If there is an use case for using persistent queues that are *exclusive* for the Camel consumer, then we can avoid using JMSMessageSelector and thus be as fast as temporary queues. > camel-jms - Using request/reply over persistent queues should be faster > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CAMEL-4202 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4202 > Project: Camel > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: camel-jms > Affects Versions: 2.7.1 > Reporter: Claus Ibsen > Assignee: Claus Ibsen > Fix For: 2.8.0 > > > See nabble > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/slow-reply-for-jms-component-when-url-contains-replyTo-tp4563075p4563075.html > When using persistent replyTo queues for request/reply over JMS, then the > ReplyManager should be faster to pickup replies. > The default spring-jms timeout is 1 sec and it impacts the performance. > Likewise the receiveTimeout should not be set on the reply managers as that > does not apply here. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira