Marco Crivellaro wrote: > > ... in the end the list of files needs to be sent over TCP the more files > you have the longer it will take. >
Transferring big file list can be an issue for slow networks. In theory I agree with you but just try. 5000 files in folder is enough to observe SFTP server response latency. Maybe the reason is default file list sorting on SFTP servers. Simple "ls filename*" (single file to list) takes over 1s (tested on linux). By the way, "ls" command is allowed only for directories or names with wildcards. For single filename it gives something like "no such file or directory" response even if the file exists. It looks that it is something to improve in SFTP server. Unfortunately we must work with servers as they are I think. Regards -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/FTP-component-enhancement-suggestion-tp4692606p4693432.html Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
