Thanks Christian for the speedy fix! (and good catch Claus. Definitely an incompatible change)
With that fix in, I'll likely start the 2.8.2 build tomorrow around noon my time. (Eastern US) If folks have any other technical objections, speak up! Dan On Wednesday, October 12, 2011 11:00:53 PM Christian Schneider wrote: > Hi Claus, > > I just committed a new version of 4500. So we do not need any change in > the dependencies anymore. > The tracing is purely additional and should not influence existing > parts. So I see at least no big risk in the backport. > > Normally I would not backport such a new feature. As we will use 2.8.2 > in products we would like to have the tracing in there so I did an > exception to only porting fixes. > > Christian > > Am 12.10.2011 16:46, schrieb Claus Ibsen: > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Daniel Kulp<dk...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Just an FYI, I plan to start the builds around noon. If anyone has > >> anything that needs to get in, speak up fast. :-) > > > > I speak up fast. > > 2.8 branch is not ready as there is a dependency change in camel-core, > > which IMHO is a show stopper. > > I have asked Christian to explain his reason for this change. But so > > far no reply. > > > > Likewise CAMEL-4500 was backported to 2.8.2 which is a *new feature* > > and therefore not something we shall > > backport to a patch release branch. > > > > This needs to be discussed at the @dev thread we have started. > > > > So we should IMHO revert the backport of CAMEL-4500 on the 2.8.2 > > branch and discuss on @dev what people can backport > > to the patch release branches. > > > >> -- > >> Daniel Kulp > >> dk...@apache.org > >> http://dankulp.com/blog > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com -- Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org http://dankulp.com/blog Talend - http://www.talend.com
