Using obr without repos already helps a lot as the featurzs deployer will only deploy the required bundles avoiding duplicates if possible.
On Saturday, October 15, 2011, Johan Edstrom <seij...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yup, > > I probably had spent another few days without that previous knowledge, it is still > in need of work. > > And using the OBR given the complexity I think personally is a no-go right now, > it isn't simple enough, nor do we have a global OBR repo. > > I did ask Tim O'Brien about a new sonatype OBR repo last week, that would help. > > > /je > > On Oct 15, 2011, at 12:26 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > >> On Friday, October 14, 2011 11:58:26 PM Johan Edstrom wrote: >>> Hey, >>> >>> Just poking around in the features, and yes I cross post this - >>> >>> I know there has been work going on with regards to creating a sane default >>> set of features but currently the CXF features in 2.4.2 (I think it was) >>> uses spring 3.0.6, the karaf features 3.0.5 and the camel features actually >>> copy in cxf with a similar version but the older neethi. >>> >>> If we want these features in a consistent state, should we have a master >>> reference? >>> >>> I know this will impact development and agility, but it sure as heck would >>> improve stability if we had a solid inheritance chain? >>> >>> I know we also have a bunch of different features in the SMX area, would a >>> new features project help? Just asking… >> >> >> This is pretty much exactly where JB and I have been going with the recent >> changes in the features. Basically, the projects all STOP redefining features >> like spring and cxf and such. Instead, they grab those from the appropriate >> place (and using a version range to accommodate updates). >> >> For example: >> Karaf 2.2.4 defines all the Spring things. Thus, neither Camel or CXF define >> that anymore. They just grab spring from there (using "[3,4)" or similar). >> Camel 2.8.2 will use the CXF 2.4.3 features directly. (no redefines) >> >> If you don't use an obr, we still have issues with different bundle versions >> of various things. I did sync CXF and Camel as much as possible a little >> while ago, but they will likely drift a bit. >> >> Anyway, Karaf 2.2.4, CXF 2.4.3, and Camel 2.8.2 will go a long way to make it >> a lot easier and more consistent. >> >> Dan >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> Cheers! >> -- >> Daniel Kulp >> dk...@apache.org >> http://dankulp.com/blog >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > -- ------------------------ Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
