Hello Jon! Thanks for fixing this issue.
Best, Christian On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Jon Anstey <jans...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, good idea. I've made this change. > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Claus Ibsen <claus.ib...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Jon Anstey <jans...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > FYI took another look at this and it is not a real issue. When using > > async > > > sends in ActiveMQ on the producer side we can't really guarantee the > > order > > > in which messages will be added to the queue. To gaurantee order we can > > > either enable sync sends, persistent messages, or transactions (all > boil > > > down to sync sends...). I made a fix for the test here: > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1202227 > > > > > > > Great. I wonder if we should just add logic to the BaseJmsTest class > > (or watever its called) to enable sync send by default? > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Jon > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Jon Anstey <jans...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Was looking into this on Friday but didn't solve it. I'll have another > > >> look today but if someone is really interesting in digging in ActiveMQ > > ;) > > >> the hint is that it works when you disable async sends. > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > j...@nanthrax.net > > >wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hi Christian, > > >>> > > >>> I guess it depends of the JMS connection pool configuration (and the > > >>> message retention/timeout). > > >>> > > >>> I will try to take a look later today from the airport. > > >>> > > >>> Regards > > >>> JB > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On 11/13/2011 12:36 AM, Christian Müller wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> I'm a bit surprising about this failed unit test [1]. It looks like > on > > >>>> slow > > >>>> boxes like the Jenkins server and Jon's Laptop ( sorry for that ;-) > ) > > the > > >>>> messages arrived out of order or we loose one. Is this (a known) > > issue in > > >>>> ActiveMQ? Because this test run very well on my machine, I cannot > dig > > >>>> deeper in this issue... > > >>>> > > >>>> [1] > > >>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/**Camel.trunk.fulltest/553/org.** > > >>>> > > apache.camel$camel-jms/**testReport/org.apache.camel.**component.jms/** > > >>>> JmsSelectorInTest/**testJmsSelectorIn/< > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/Camel.trunk.fulltest/553/org.apache.camel$camel-jms/testReport/org.apache.camel.component.jms/JmsSelectorInTest/testJmsSelectorIn/ > > > > > >>>> > > >>>> Best, > > >>>> Christian > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> -- > > >>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > > >>> jbono...@apache.org > > >>> http://blog.nanthrax.net > > >>> Talend - http://www.talend.com > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Cheers, > > >> Jon > > >> --------------- > > >> FuseSource > > >> Email: j...@fusesource.com > > >> Web: fusesource.com > > >> Twitter: jon_anstey > > >> Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com > > >> Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Cheers, > > > Jon > > > --------------- > > > FuseSource > > > Email: j...@fusesource.com > > > Web: fusesource.com > > > Twitter: jon_anstey > > > Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com > > > Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Claus Ibsen > > ----------------- > > FuseSource > > Email: cib...@fusesource.com > > Web: http://fusesource.com > > Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews > > Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ > > Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/ > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Jon > --------------- > FuseSource > Email: j...@fusesource.com > Web: fusesource.com > Twitter: jon_anstey > Blog: http://janstey.blogspot.com > Author of Camel in Action: http://manning.com/ibsen >
