On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Babak Vahdat
<babak.vah...@swissonline.ch> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Through [1] & [2] the issues being mentioned by this thread have been
> already resolved. Before beginning of this activity
> I used to see 1991 compiler warnings, however right now only 310 are left,
> mostly because of the raw type references to the
> generic type ProcessorDefinition whose fixing would be not that trivial but
> hope to fix it as well at sometimes later. There're
> also two remaining tasks which we should better postpone, for which I've
> opened [3] to track by a Camel 3.x release.
>

You should be really careful changing generics in the model package
(eg the xxxDefinition) stuff.

As compilers on AIX, HP-UX, Solairs and other such platforms may not
compile the source code.
A few spots we got some special type casts to work around those platforms.

However their JDK may get better over time. But we may risk issues for
these people.



> That would be great if we could keep on that quality as otherwise in just
> couple of months we would be again there where we began
> with this! My thanks also to Claus & Hadrian for assisting me on the JIRA
> tickets at the time I couldn't touch the code by myself.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4796
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4899
> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4921
>
> Babak
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Trunk-Code-Cleanup-tp5071594p5158015.html
> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus, fusenews
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen/

Reply via email to