+1 Christian
Sent from a mobile device Am 06.03.2012 09:07 schrieb "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" <j...@nanthrax.net>: > +1 it makes sense. > > Regards > JB > > On 03/06/2012 08:59 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Glen Mazza (Talend)<gma...@talend.com> >> wrote: >> >>> OK, with Camel 2.0 as the doc base I've been removing the Camel 1.x text >>> and >>> changing text that says "Starting with Camel 2.0, we offer..." to "We >>> offer..." (still leaving that terminology for Camel>= 2.1). Next, on our >>> components page >>> (http://camel.apache.org/**components.html<http://camel.apache.org/components.html>) >>> I'll be removing >>> the three or four "Camel 1.x use this link" references which point to >>> Camel >>> 1-specific components, and (if I have the delete permissions) those Camel >>> 1.x-only pages themselves. This can be reverted should there be any >>> objections. >>> >>> >> Yeah I think this is fine as 1.x is EOL for 1+ year now. >> >> >> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.** >>> com/DISCUSS-Remove-Camel-1-x-**only-material-from-the-wiki-** >>> documentation-**tp5107266p5538599.html<http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Remove-Camel-1-x-only-material-from-the-wiki-documentation-tp5107266p5538599.html> >>> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >> >> >> >> > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > jbono...@apache.org > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com >
