> We should probably name it NoopAsyncCallback as IMHO thats a better name.
I'm used to naming Noop- callbacks as Empty-ones but Noop sounds fine as well :) . > Also we may consider a single static instance as its just a noop, eg > like Collections.emptyList() does. I thought about it but decided to make patch as simple as possible. BTW I thought also about utility like this: AsyncCallbacks.noop(); AsyncCallbacks.log(exchange); // callback that logs to SLF4J that exchange has been processed. -- Henryk Konsek http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com
