-1 I see no real reason to break stuff
On 19 June 2012 19:37, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Using URIs to identify and configure Endpoints is a notable Apache Camel > innovation. This feature was present in Camel from its first release. The > definition of the URIs syntax in unambiguous and defined in RFC-2396 [1]. > > Some components introduced along the way do not use valid URIs and this > needs to be corrected. This vote is intended to formalize the apparent lazy > consensus in the [discuss] thread [2] on the dev@ list. This vote reflects > agreement with the principle only. If this vote passes the details of the > solution will be fleshed out later. > > > [ ] +1 Camel MUST use valid URIs for Endpoint configuration > [ ] -1 Camel does not need to use valid URIs (please provide reason). > > Vote is open for at least 72 hours. > > > -- > Hadrian Zbarcea > Principal Software Architect > Talend, Inc > http://coders.talend.com/ > http://camelbot.blogspot.com/ > > [1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt > [2] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/camel-dev/201206.mbox/%3C4FD60168.5090009%40gmail.com%3E -- James ------- FuseSource Email: ja...@fusesource.com Web: http://fusesource.com Twitter: jstrachan, fusenews Blog: http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ FuseSource: integration everywhere
