Hi Scott, You can use the @Ignore annotation instead of hacking the pom if the test is failed on the CI. BTW, you still need to keep on eye on the Ignored (failed) test.
-- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English) http://jnn.javaeye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: willemjiang On Saturday, September 29, 2012 at 7:23 AM, sully6...@apache.org wrote: > Author: sully6768 > Date: Fri Sep 28 23:23:26 2012 > New Revision: 1391694 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1391694&view=rev > Log: > Disabled batch transaction tests > > Modified: > camel/trunk/components/camel-sjms/pom.xml > > Modified: camel/trunk/components/camel-sjms/pom.xml > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/camel/trunk/components/camel-sjms/pom.xml?rev=1391694&r1=1391693&r2=1391694&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- camel/trunk/components/camel-sjms/pom.xml (original) > +++ camel/trunk/components/camel-sjms/pom.xml Fri Sep 28 23:23:26 2012 > @@ -136,11 +136,12 @@ > <configuration> > <forkMode>pertest</forkMode> > <argLine>-Xmx512M</argLine> > -<!-- <excludes> --> > -<!-- <exclude>**/BatchTransactedConcurrentMultipleConsumerTest.*</exclude> > --> > + <excludes> > + <exclude>**/BatchTransactedConcurrentMultipleConsumerTest.*</exclude> > + <exclude>**/BatchTransactedTopicConsumerTest.*</exclude> > <!-- > <exclude>**/BatchTransactedConcurrentMultipleRouteConsumersTest.*</exclude> > --> > <!-- <exclude>**/TransactedConcurrentConsumersTest.*</exclude> --> > -<!-- </excludes> --> > + </excludes> > </configuration> > </plugin> > <plugin>
