Hi

Okay it took me a long time to dig into this. I kinda hate the
computer generated MANIFEST.MF files in those 76 cut lines format.
Makes comparing 2 version a big challenge. If at at least the BND tool
could generat a line per package, making diff much easier for humans.

Only by using a visual diff tool I could spot a problem.

In Camel 2.10 the MANIFEST.MF is generated with [1.2,2) for the
spring-dm osgi stuff.

sembler;version="[3,4)",org.springframework.jmx.export.metadata;version
 ="[3,4)",org.springframework.osgi.context;version="[1.2,2)";resolution:
 =optional,org.springframework.remoting.support;version="[3,4)",org.spri
 ngframework.transaction;version="[3,4)",org.springframework.transaction
 .support;version="[3,4)",org.springframework.util;version="[3,4)",org.w
 3c.dom


But on trunk its using spring framework range [3,4) which is wrong

sembler;version="[3,4)",org.springframework.jmx.export.metadata;version
 ="[3,4)",org.springframework.osgi.context;version="[3,4)";resolution:=o
 ptional,org.springframework.remoting.support;version="[3,4)",org.spring
 framework.transaction;version="[3,4)",org.springframework.transaction.s
 upport;version="[3,4)",org.springframework.util;version="[3,4)",org.w3c
 .dom


So I would need to figure out in our marvelous build system, to make
it use the old behavior, so it can use the correct version ranges.





On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Babak Vahdat
<babak.vah...@swissonline.ch> wrote:
> Hi
>
> If I remember correctly, yesterday that was also one of my suspections as
> well so that I reverted locally back to 4.2, however still observing the
> same behaviour.
> Also tried downgrading felix-compendium, felix-configadmin and
> felix-framework versions back to what they were before the upgrade to OSGi
> 4.3 and still no change in the behaviour.
>
> I suspect the OSGi POM settings being broken *before* this OSGi upgrade,
> like <camel.osgi.import.defaults> and whatnot.
>
> Babak
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Builds-on-Jenkins-tp5721653p5721717.html
> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



-- 
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
Email: cib...@redhat.com
Web: http://fusesource.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen

Reply via email to