Hi,

my blog is focused on WAR/WABs I'm gonna try to add some details on how to
achieve  this via the whiteboard extender.
It's gonna take a bit :) If it's not possible now, I'm gonna add it for
Pax-Web 3.0

regards, Achim


2013/1/31 Christian Müller <christian.muel...@gmail.com>

> Some month ago I was looking for a way to bind camel-cxf to a specific
> port, using the OSGI HTTP service.
> Achim blogged about binding a web application to a specific port, using the
> OSGI HTTP service and an adapted jetty.xml configuration [1]. I'm wondering
> whether we can do the same with camel-cxf?
>
> The issue we face at present is, that all your services (service for
> customer A, service for customer B, ...) are accessible on all ports. We
> use specific ports for each customer, secured with client certificates to
> make sure they only can access this port. But because all services are
> exposed on all ports, this is useless... :-(
> I know we can start an individual jetty for each service, but imagine we
> have 10 different customer with individual applications. Each application
> is composed of multiple bundles. Let's say 5 different bundles expose a web
> service. This will end up starting 50 Jetty instances, right? Sounds very
> inefficient and difficult to maintain for our operations people...
>
> Has an CXF expert time to look into it? I'm willing to sponsor a beer for
> him/her - or two... ;-)
>
> [1]
>
> http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/2013/01/bind-certain-web-applications-to-specific-httpconnectors/
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
> --
>



-- 

Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer &
Project Lead
OPS4J Pax for Vaadin <http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/PAXVAADIN/Home>
Commiter & Project Lead
blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>

Reply via email to