Because Camel and Camel-Extra are Java based projects, I don't think we should integrate this component (even if it's a cool component for Scala guys). As Claus mentioned, we can add a link from our components page to your GitHub project, if you want.
Best, Christian On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:14 AM, iandebeer <i...@zenaptix.com> wrote: > Hi > I have created a pull request for Scomp that contains all the > modifications I made to that project. I have discussed this with Dejan > Bosanac and I am waiting for the pull request to be incorporated. One small > snag is that the the test uses an imbedded Apollo broker and because of the > Scala 2.10 dependency we now need the latest SNAPSHOT release of Apollo to > run the tests. I hope that a Scala 2.10 compliant release of Apollo is > planned for the near future. > I have moved the camel-scomp component into a a new camel-scomp repo: > https://github.com/zenaptix/camel-scomp.git with all the refactorings you > suggested. > (I am actually happy for the name change, due to this unfortunate > ambiguity: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=camel%20stomp) > So once we have Scomp updated we are good to go. > Regards > Ian > > > On 01 Feb 2013, at 9:09 AM, hekonsek [via Camel] < > ml-node+s465427n5726700...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > > > > That is a good approach. > > > .. > > > I am waiting for a response. > > > > Great :) Just keep me in the loop. > > > > -- > > Henryk Konsek > > http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com > > > > > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Contributing-Apollo-Component-tp5726153p5726700.html > > To unsubscribe from Contributing Apollo Component, click here. > > NAML > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Re-Contributing-Scomp-Component-was-Contributing-Stomp-Component-tp5726868.html > Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --
