Hi Charles, > What you suggest corresponds to what we have done for "direct-vm" component
Yes, I'm aware that vm and vm-direct components handle static references. I'm just wondering if this approach has any drawbacks or corner cases (probably OSGI-related) I'm not aware of. I don't want to reinvent the wheel and fall into some pitfalls you guys have already discovered some time ago. > Remark : If you plan to share data using a cache, then a solution based on > camel-cache, camel-hazelcast, hazelcast, ... could be also the way to go. Cache was just an example of some shared state :) . In real life-solution I would definitely prefer delegation to dedicated cache component, just as you suggested. -- Henryk Konsek http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com
