For regression tests of other OSS components Gump comes to my mind ;)
I am sure that "the ASF" doesn't want to give guarantees to non-ASF
components, while "the community" could (if they are willing to)...

Jan

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Hadrian Zbarcea [mailto:hzbar...@gmail.com] 
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. Februar 2013 18:22
An: dev@camel.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS CAMEL 3.0] weekly IRC chat at 02/12/2013 7:00PM -
8:00PM CET

Thanks Christian. That, plus what do you do once you get past say 200
components, what about 500?

How would you grow to that kind of number of components? Is it realistic?
Actually it is. But how many of those are gonna be hosted at Apache? What
kind of guarantees do we make for the non-ASF camel components? How do we
support other communities (camel-extra comes to mind)? What about regression
tests? Tools?

So the context is a bit larger. Henryk, I am sure you hit some the problems
yourself, while doing the work on camel-extra others (me
included) dodged for a good while.

Cheers
Hadrian


On 02/14/2013 12:15 PM, Christian Müller wrote:
> We IRC'ed about the question whether we should release every component 
> each time or only the components we changed in this version. There are 
> some pros and cons...
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
> Sent from a mobile device
> Am 14.02.2013 17:32 schrieb "Henryk Konsek" <hekon...@gmail.com>:
>
>>> Therefore I'll have to come back to this a bit later. Please ping me
>> again
>>> if I don't.
>>
>> Sure I will. :)
>>
>> BTW If the discussion took place on mailing list and it is easy to 
>> Google, you could send me a link to an appropriate nabble archive (or
>> keywords) so I can make my homework.
>>
>> --
>> Henryk Konsek
>> http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com
>>
>

Reply via email to