No its fine as is, according to the javadoc. Its only intended to be
overridden for special use-cases.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) <apa...@materne.de> wrote:
> package org.apache.camel.impl;
>
> public abstract class MessageSupport implements Message {
>
>
>
> /**
>
> * A factory method to allow a provider to lazily create the message
> body
>
> * for inbound messages from other sources
>
> *
>
> * @return the value of the message body or null if there is no value
>
> * available
>
> */
>
> protected Object createBody() {
>
> return null;
>
> }
>
>
>
>
>
> Should this method be abstract?
>
> Constantly returning null doesnt seems to be good to me ....
>
>
>
>
>
> Jan
>
--
Claus Ibsen
-----------------
Red Hat, Inc.
Email: cib...@redhat.com
Twitter: davsclaus
Blog: http://davsclaus.com
Author of Camel in Action: http://www.manning.com/ibsen
