Hi Hadrian, I released the Camel 2.12.0 with JDK 1.7, as the compile plugin is set the source and target with 1.6, I don’t get any complain about it.
As I had said the HTML documentation issue could cause some trouble when some tools to load camel bundles, I changed my vote to -1. We need to recut the kit with JDK 1.7. -- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. Web: http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com(http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) (English) http://jnn.iteye.com(http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On February 19, 2014 at 11:39:13 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea (hzbar...@gmail.com) wrote: > > Babak, per the ASF policy we can release 2.12.3 even with -1s. > However, I usually shoot for consensus. Here's what I am going > to do in > this case, because yours is the only -1 with an overwhelming majority > of > +1s. I'll give it another 12 hours and if nothing changes I will > close > the vote and release 2.12.3. If within this time you convince > another > PMC member to change his vote I will cancel this vote. > > We had two releases in the past, years ago (1.4 and 1.5 time) that > were > built with a newer version that the oldest supported and we got > burned > by the version of the class file format. (I was the one who messed > up, > had to redo the releases and learned my lesson). I personally > don't > release with a newer java version than the oldest supported. > > Cheers, > Hadrian > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html > > > On 02/19/2014 10:19 AM, Babak Vahdat wrote: > > Hi Harian, > > > > I'm actually still -1 to this release candidate as the HTML documentation > > inside the bundles are missing (as a side effect of Java 6 being > used for > > building instead of Java 7). This requirement has been clearly > stated inside > > our release guides (yes, I was the one who added that note): > > > > http://camel.apache.org/release-guide.html > > > > And we've also discussed this many times @ the dev-forum as well: > > > > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/improving-Endpoint-documentation-and-tooling-td5731334.html > > > > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Our-builds-looks-really-bad-tp5731673p5731743.html > > > > > > That all said, I may sound too pedantic, sorry for that! > > > > Last but not least I ask for apologies by the Apache Camel PMC > because of > > the STUPID mistake I made while voting for the 2.11.4 release > candidate: > > > > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-11-4-tp5747362p5747430.html > > > > > > As I had A LOT OF BEERS the night before that vote of mine. So I guess > that > > was why my brain went terribly wrong :) > > > > Many thanks for your effort to prepare these two release candidates! > > > > Babak > > > > > > hadrian wrote > >> Babak, > >> > >> We're past the 72 hours mark and I would like to close this vote > with a > >> consensus is possible. Do you still think we have an issue, > or you want > >> to consider reverting your vote? > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Hadrian > >> > >> > >> On 02/17/2014 05:06 AM, Babak Vahdat wrote: > >>> Hi Willem, > >>> > >>> can you please elaborate your explanation a bit? Currently > what we've on > >>> the > >>> 2.12.x. as well as 2.11.x branches is this: > >>> > >>> > >> > >> 2.7.10 > >> > >>> > >> > >> [2.6,2.9) > >> > >>> Now to my understanding this should become: > >>> > >>> > >> > >> 2.7.10 > >> > >>> > >> > >> [2.6,3) > >> > >>> I think the current range is a problem for the OSGi folks because > if e.g. > >>> there's a bug-fix being provided in CXF 2.7.10, currently > they can't > >>> force > >>> the Container to make use of CXF 2.7.10 while they install > the > >>> "camel-cxf" > >>> feature version 2.12.3 or 2.11.4 (e.g. in the context of a > dependency of > >>> their own Karaf feature "my-cool-app-karaf-feature") > because the current > >>> range does NOT include 2.7.10. > >>> > >>> Babak > >>> > >>> > >>> Willem.Jiang wrote > >>>> There are some patches of supporting CXF 3.x are not merged > to > >>>> camel-2.12.x and camel-2.11.x. > >>>> So the cxf version rang of camel-2.12.x and camel-2.11.x > is right. > >>>> > >>>> I don’t think it’s a show-stopper. > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Willem Jiang > >>>> > >>>> Red Hat, Inc. > >>>> Web: http://www.redhat.com > >>>> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com(http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/) > >>>> (English) > >>>> http://jnn.iteye.com(http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese) > >>>> Twitter: willemjiang > >>>> Weibo: 姜宁willem > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On February 16, 2014 at 11:35:56 PM, Babak Vahdat ( > >>>> babak.vahdat@ > >>>> ) wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> O.K. the build has been definetly done using Java 6 as this's > how > >>>>> MANIFEST.MF > >>>>> of camel-core-2.12.3.jar looks like: > >>>>> > >>>>> Manifest-Version: 1.0 > >>>>> Bnd-LastModified: 1392475192207 > >>>>> Build-Jdk: 1.6.0_45 > >>>>> Built-By: hadrian > >>>>> ... > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Other than that the backport of the fix for CAMEL-7170 did > NOT > >>>>> adjust the > >>>>> maven property accordingly, so on the > >>>>> master branch > >>>>> we've got: > >>>>> > >>>>> 2.7.10 > >>>>> [2.6,4.0) > >>>>> > >>>>> Which is fine, however on the 2.12.x as well as the 2.11.x > branch > >>>>> we've got: > >>>>> > >>>>> 2.7.10 > >>>>> [2.6,2.9) > >>>>> > >>>>> So here's my -1 > >>>>> > >>>>> Babak > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Babak Vahdat wrote > >>>>>> Hi > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The HTML component documentation inside the JARs are > missing. > >>>>> I assume > >>>>>> Java 6 has been used for building this release candidate. > See > >>>>> also the > >>>>>> first "Note" @ http://camel.apache.org/release-guide.html > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Babak > >>>>>> hadrian wrote > >>>>>>> This is a vote to release Apache Camel 2.12.3, a patch > release > >>>>> coming > >>>>>>> with about 128 issues fixed. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Release notes: > >>>>>>> > >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12311211&version=12325593 > >>>>> > >>>>>>> Staging repo: > >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1002 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Tarballs: > >>>>>>> > >>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1002/org/apache/camel/apache-camel/2.12.3/ > >>>>> > >>>>>>> Tag: > >>>>>>> > >>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=camel.git;a=tag;h=4bf31d2e2cbc34fda60d68c0dd33cb39d63ba1c6 > >>>>> > >>>>>>> Please test this release candidate and cast your vote. > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release the binary as Apache Camel 2.12.3 > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 Veto the release (provide specific comments) > >>>>>>> Vote is open for at least 72 hours. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> Hadrian > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> View this message in context: > >>>>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-12-3-tp5747361p5747375.html > >>>>> > >>>>> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> View this message in context: > >>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-12-3-tp5747361p5747421.html > >>> > >>> Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Release-Apache-Camel-2-12-3-tp5747361p5747563.html > > > > Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
